Monday 25 February 2008

Friday 22 February 2008

More ratings and rantings

Just finished rating the tutor bit of Wetpaint. We think we're reasonably consistent with other views but we are being much gentler with priority 1's in an attempt to not overload the technical team. It does seem that there are far too many 1's coming through from others that might not get the chance to be developed.

Wednesday 13 February 2008

Rating the Ratings!

Dave and I went to Wetpaint to go through the different features of the learner area and what sections would be useful for the learners to see.

This needed a scale from 1-5, (1 being high priority and 5 being low).

Problems with feedback back on the forum: I added all the responses in 1 forum post, but could not set it up in a pretty fashion. We wanted to lay it out in a table and add bold tags, etc, but could not achieve this.

In the end we just listed the features, gave a score and a brief summary of what we thought. Some areas are essential and fit in nicely with the scope of the project and the need for the development of the portal/access point, others are not so essential and that information could be found and accessed elsewhere.

It will be interesting to see the other project partners responses on this area.